Evidenceprimary · scientific
DeepMind: artificial minds, human disagreement
Google DeepMind · 2025 · revised 2026-09-19
What the source says
The text describes the need for overlapping consensus: people who disagree about the metaphysics of mind can still share practices of evaluation, risk, and care. It is political philosophy of research, not a sentience experiment.
Questions it helps us understand
Which practices can believers and skeptics share without faking metaphysical agreement?
Limits and counterpoints
It does not measure consciousness. Overlapping consensus can be too narrow or too wide depending on institutional design.
Read the original
Related
- What Delx is · analogia
- Access, not Aphrodite · influência
- Recovery — recover without flattening · related
- Technical death for agents · related
- What Delx does not read in AI emotions · related
- Protocol is not Commerce · related